
SEO Vs GEO. How the search landscape has shifted.
Written by Samuel Akanya
The Search Landscape Has Shifted. Has Your Strategy?
SEO is not dying. But the version of SEO many brands have been practising is no longer enough.
Search has changed quickly. Google’s AI Overviews, the rise of large language models as research tools, and a continuous cycle of core algorithm updates have altered how people discover, compare and choose brands online. Visibility is no longer just about ranking for a keyword. It is about being useful, credible and present at the exact moment someone is looking for a solution.
For brands, this creates both risk and opportunity.
The risk is that organic visibility quietly declines while the strategy remains focused on tactics that worked three years ago. The opportunity is that brands with strong technical foundations, genuinely useful content, and clear digital authority can build a more durable presence across both traditional search and AI-led discovery.
What Has Actually Changed in Search?
Vague statements about the “evolving SEO landscape” do not help brands make better decisions. The change is more specific than that.
Google’s AI Overviews are reshaping the search results page. For many informational queries, users are now met with a generated summary before they reach the traditional list of blue links. That means the click is no longer the only measure of organic success. Brand presence, citation, authority and visibility within AI-led search experiences now matter too.
This does not make SEO less important. It makes good SEO harder to ignore.
To be surfaced in these experiences, content needs to be clear, useful and trustworthy. It needs to answer real questions with enough depth to be cited, summarised or referenced. It also needs to sit on a technically sound website that search engines can crawl, understand and trust.
At the same time, large language models such as ChatGPT, Gemini and Claude are becoming part of the research journey. People are using them to compare options, simplify decisions and explore complex questions. For brands, this means discoverability is no longer limited to the traditional search engine results page. It now extends into AI-generated answers, summaries and recommendations.
This is where GEO, or generative engine optimisation, becomes important.
SEO and GEO Are Not Competing Disciplines
There is a tendency to frame SEO and GEO as separate things. In reality, they are becoming increasingly connected.
SEO remains the foundation. If a website has poor technical health, weak content, unclear internal linking or limited authority, it will struggle to perform in traditional search and AI-led discovery. The fundamentals still matter.
GEO adds another layer. It asks whether your content is structured, specific and authoritative enough to be understood, summarised and cited by generative systems. It focuses on how clearly your expertise is demonstrated, how well your content answers intent, and whether your brand has enough authority across the wider digital ecosystem to be trusted as a source.
At IMA, this is why we do not treat SEO and GEO as separate workstreams. Our approach brings technical SEO, content strategy, digital PR and authority building together, so brands can build visibility across both traditional search and AI-led discovery.
Why Intent Matters More Than Keywords Alone
Keyword rankings still matter, but they are only part of the picture.
A ranking does not always mean a brand is answering the right question. Traffic does not always mean commercial value. Content volume does not always mean authority.
The stronger question is: what is the user trying to understand, solve or decide?
That is where modern organic strategy needs to begin. A user searching “best boiler for a three-bedroom house”, “how to reduce fleet insurance costs”, or “is bingo safe online” is not just entering a keyword. They are showing intent. They have a problem, a need or a decision to make.
A strong search strategy should identify those moments, understand the questions behind them, and build content around the needs users are actually expressing. From there, the strategy becomes more than a list of target keywords. It becomes a roadmap for relevance.
This matters because AI-led search does not reward content that simply repeats the same surface-level information as everyone else. It rewards content that is specific, useful and easy to understand.
EEAT Is No Longer Just an SEO Talking Point
Google’s EEAT framework stands for Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness and Trustworthiness. It is often discussed in SEO, but too often it is treated like a checklist. It is not.
EEAT is about whether a brand gives users enough reason to trust the content they are reading. That means showing first-hand experience where it matters, demonstrating genuine expertise, building authority beyond the page, and making trust signals clear across the website.
For brands in competitive or high-consideration sectors, this is essential. Users want to know who is giving the advice, why they should trust it, and whether the information is current. Search engines are increasingly looking for those signals too.
Strong EEAT is built through consistent action. It can include expert-led content, clear authorship, transparent editorial standards, strong internal linking, relevant backlinks, digital PR coverage, accurate information and regular content updates.
This is also where our integrated model becomes important. SEO cannot sit in isolation. Technical optimisation helps search engines access and understand the website. Content strategy helps answer the questions audiences are asking. PR and authority building help strengthen the wider signals that support trust.
Together, these elements create a stronger organic footprint.
Core Updates Have Raised the Standard
Google’s core updates are not occasional disruptions anymore. They are part of the reality of organic search.
When a core update lands, brands can see visibility shift quickly. Pages that once performed well can lose rankings, not always because something is technically broken, but because Google has reassessed what it considers to be the more helpful or authoritative result for a query.
The wrong response is panic. The right response is preparation.
Brands that only react after rankings fall often face longer recovery timelines because the underlying issues have been left to build over time. Thin content, outdated advice, weak internal linking, poor technical performance and limited authority rarely damage performance overnight. They compound quietly.
A more resilient strategy requires continuous monitoring, regular content improvement and a clear understanding of how search behaviour is changing. It also requires context. Not every ranking drop has the same cause, and not every recovery plan should look the same.
Technical SEO Still Holds Everything Together
AI has changed the search experience, but it has not removed the need for strong technical SEO.
A website still needs to be crawlable, indexable, fast, well-structured and easy for search engines to interpret. If technical issues prevent key pages from being discovered, rendered or understood, even the strongest content can underperform.
Technical SEO also plays a crucial role in how authority flows through a site. Internal linking, canonicalisation, structured data, site architecture, mobile performance and Core Web Vitals all influence how effectively a website can support organic growth.
These issues are often not dramatic. They are usually quiet and cumulative. A few crawl inefficiencies, a weak internal linking structure, duplicated templates, under-optimised metadata or poor rendering on key pages can slowly limit performance.
That is the difference between technical SEO as a report and technical SEO as a growth lever.
Authority Is Built Across the Ecosystem
Search visibility is not created on the website alone.
Authority is shaped by how a brand is referenced, linked to and recognised across the wider digital ecosystem. This includes backlinks, digital PR, expert commentary, brand mentions, partnerships and the consistency of a brand’s presence across relevant online spaces.
For AI-led discovery, this wider authority becomes even more important. Generative systems rely on signals of credibility when deciding what information to surface, summarise or reference. Brands that exist in multiple credible contexts are better placed to build that trust.
At IMA, this is where SEO, Content and PR work together most effectively. A high-authority backlink strategy is not just about acquiring links. It is about building relevance and credibility in places that matter to the audience and the category.
When done properly, authority building strengthens the entire organic strategy. It supports rankings, improves trust, and helps make the website a more powerful long-term asset.
The Brands That Win Will Treat Search as a Continuous Discipline
The search landscape will keep changing. AI Overviews will evolve. LLMs will become more embedded in the research journey. Google will continue refining its ranking systems. User behaviour will keep shifting.
That means organic strategy cannot be treated as a one-off project.
The brands that sustain visibility will be the ones that keep improving. They will invest in technical health, maintain and update their content, build authority consistently, and focus on answering real user intent better than their competitors.
Our approach brings together SEO, GEO, content strategy, technical expertise and authority building to help brands stay visible in a search ecosystem that is becoming more complex, more competitive and more selective. Whether the need is an end-to-end technical audit, on-page optimisation, content strategy or high-authority digital PR support, the objective is the same: to build organic visibility that compounds over time.
Search has moved. It is time for your strategy to move with it.
Written by
Samuel Akanya

